The word “rural,” or more commonly “village,” often evokes a shared image in our minds: a farming community engaged in agricultural life. While this image holds some truth, rural communities also possess complex social and economic structures that are equally vital.

In the context of rural transformation, economic data and resources often take center stage. Yet, these factors must be understood in relation to the community, society, and local cultural fabric. Rural development is not only an environmental matter—it encompasses lifestyle, culture, and the socio-economic components of rural life. Therefore, rural development holds a critical position in the national economy, especially in terms of advancing regional equity and development levels.

As Ercan (2001) notes, “Definitions of development do not only reflect the present—they also include an imagined past and a projected future. In order to reinterpret these frameworks according to our own realities, we must engage with the processes that define and objectify us, exploring their historical, social, and intellectual backgrounds.”

Today, the disconnect between urban and rural policies continues to widen the divide between city and countryside. To restore spatial balance, the interrelationship between urban and rural areas must be thoughtfully re-established.

Thrace (Trakya), geographically bridging Anatolia and Europe, has historically served as a crossroads for various civilizations. This unique position has influenced both its rich local culture and the diversity of external influences it has absorbed. Protecting rural heritage is key to preserving this distinct identity and cultural value. Within this framework, safeguarding Trakya's cultural assets and recognizing them as part of a potential cultural sector model is of great importance.

Kırklareli, with a settlement history dating back to 5800 BC, is one of the region's oldest inhabited areas. Strategically positioned along historic trade and migration routes, it bears the marks of many past civilizations. The region's dense concentration of past and present economic and cultural hubs reinforces its strategic importance.

Lüleburgaz stands out in this context—not only for its geographic proximity and contrasts between urban and rural but also for its socio-economic landscape. Unlike its neighboring areas known for agriculture, Lüleburgaz is distinguished by its industrial character. However, a closer look reveals that each village within the district holds distinct economic potentials, allowing for a multi-nodal rural development model.

Following in-depth research and contextual analysis, five key thresholds (eşikler) were identified to better understand and design for Lüleburgaz’s rural structure: Geographical, Ecological, Economic, Social, and Infrastructural. These thresholds serve as the foundation for recognizing and enhancing the district’s unique rural potentials.

The core vision is to create a sustainable, agriculturally-based rural-industrial landscape that integrates urban and rural dynamics while protecting and enhancing ecological values. This is supported by four main principles:

• Rural-Urban Integration,

• Adaptation to Climate Change,

• Green Growth and Productivity,

• Social Cohesion and Participation,

• and Polycentric & Smart Growth.